Different futures are already open at q8.
The early action-world is as separated as it is at q32, while a whole-over-parts forecasting relation rises before sustained visible structure.
01 · how we looked
To see this, we had to look beyond the picture.
A visible Flow Lenia frame shows where the matter is, although it does not show all of the channel composition hidden beneath that sum, nor does it tell us which nearby futures remain reachable; we therefore compared forecasts, interventions, and later responses from the same exact checkpoints.
One instrument, which we call whole-over-parts, compares how well the full state forecasts its next state with how well the strongest tested separable split forecasts it; when this difference rises, the whole is catching up with that split, although in the prospective precursor its absolute level remains negative and the best split still forecasts better at every measured phase. This is a forecasting comparison inspired by GARD and related compositional questions, not an identification with IIT Φ.
Because one score could easily mistake a convenient coordinate for a cause, we also intervened directly: we branched exact futures from the same checkpoint, applied matched writes at different ages, ran feedback policies and then released them, and swapped hidden channel composition while holding the visible field exactly fixed. The account that follows depends on where these different views agree, and it keeps their disagreements visible when they do not.
Schematic · the forecasting instrumentThis diagram explains the comparison without showing measured field values or implying that “the whole beats the parts.”
whole-over-parts = joint predictive information − strongest tested separable predictionOne checkpoint, many exact continuations
We branch matched interventions or noise futures from the same saved state, then measure how far their later outcomes spread.
The same picture can hide different states
The visible field is the sum of its channels, so two exactly identical images can contain different channel mixtures and later respond differently.
A question fixed before the run / a map drawn afterward
Frozen tests answer decisions written before their results were visible, while post-hoc panels help us understand a mechanism or design the next test without taking on that earlier status.
Synthesis map · five separable evidence axesThe horizontal placement organizes the report; it is explicitly not developmental order. Passport onset is left-censored because re-identification already succeeds at q12→24.
Action-world, passport, information, closure, and control are deliberately kept on different clocks.02 · before the silhouette
Before a persistent body can be seen, interventions already open different futures.
We found this in two independent ways: a fresh prospective run showed the whole-over-parts relation rising during the reorganization that precedes sustained form, while a fixed-age branching assay found that the alternative futures opened at q8 were already at least as separated as those opened at q32.
Measured · two kinds of early evidenceThe intervals are family/window bootstrap intervals from the bound result files. The q8 ratio is descriptive fixed-age evidence.
prospective descriptiveThe 95% interval is +0.231 to +0.502, with 39/54 eligible windows and 15/16 family means positive; the rise is a catch-up of about 4% of the whole-state ~8.76 nats, while the best split remains ahead.
Adding whole−sum changes held-out AUC from 0.8089 to 0.8093, so prediction of the specific visible event remains unresolved even though the broader pre-form relation rises.
Whole−sum predicts a narrower future timing range after checkpoint, shape, topology, size, and raw-change controls; interval −0.420 to −0.045.
Future-history separation at q8 is 104.4% of q32 across 39 organisms and 5,616 futures.
When we aligned runs retrospectively to their visible transition, whole-over-parts moved from −1.75 early to −0.32 at the transition, a +1.43 rise in all 16 families; that atlas told us where the change tended to occur, while the separate prospective run tested whether anything could be seen without knowing the future first.
However, the geometry behaved like a clockit did not behave like a lever
Past-only geometry tracked developmental progress, with 39 of 62 trajectories moving strictly in one direction, but adding it to ordinary controls made the held-out countdown slightly worse rather than better: error changed from 39.88 to 40.46 steps. Direct interventions chosen to be Φ-high or Φ-low were equally awkward as a universal control, because their effects changed sign with phase.
Those results made the geometry useful in a different way, because it could tell us where a run was in its reorganization even though pushing the score itself did not reliably advance that process.
03 · selective closure
Development closes some possibilities while leaving shape plural.
As the field reorganizes, event timing becomes less variable, spatial interventions lose leverage, and the effect of one action becomes less dependent on which action preceded it; yet sibling runs continue to spread across a wider range of mature shapes, so the loss of one freedom does not imply the loss of all the others.
In a fresh, future-blind cohort, higher prospective whole−sum predicts less timing spread across nine matched futures.
After release, the cumulative open-minus-closed causal-history distance is +0.075, with interval +0.059 to +0.090 and the same direction in 16/16 families.
The turn exceeds two passages later by +0.00290, interval +0.00049 to +0.00529, although the predeclared requirement that the effect persist for four passages was not met.
Context rewrites the second-action geometry more before the turn than after it, with difference +0.002935 and interval +0.000493 to +0.005409 across 19 families.
Future event times become less variable.
The strongest prospective relation is with a contraction in timing range, although a direct nested branching primary on timing itself was flat and only its predeclared fine-field secondary moved, by roughly 2.3%.
Where the matter sits matters from the beginning.
When we scrambled the same cells while preserving genotype, mass, composition, and world, formation slowed by 12.85, 22.51, and 30.59 passages at successively finer scrambling scales.
A second action becomes less dependent on the first.
After the turn, the six-edge geometry of second-action outcomes changes less when we vary the first-action context, which is the specific sense in which the action grammar becomes harder to rewrite.
Siblings fan outward instead of converging.
Initialization-perturbed width grows from 0.032 at age 60 to 0.079 at age 900, so here commitment means increasing rigidity within an individuating history, not convergence on one silhouette.
Exact visible-state controlthe same picture can contain a different future
Across 156 transplant starts, the visible fields were bit-for-bit identical while their hidden channel composition differed; the frozen donor-axis primary was flat, +0.050 [−0.258,+0.370], and hybrids remained farther from the donor than the host in all 16 families. However, a predeclared secondary followed 27.9% of the donor’s natural growth direction [12.1%,47.2%] in 14/16 families, with a strong directional asymmetry.
A fresh transplant of older composition did not advance the developmental clock, while a separate post-hoc counterweight found that hidden displacement restrained later radius, −0.096 [−0.156,−0.043]. Taken together, these experiments show that hidden composition changes what happens next, although it does not act like a simple donor identity or a portable older-state clock. frozen posthoc
04 · following the fine-shape clue
The small shape effect did not repeat cleanly, and the distinction became sharper.
We ran four sibling experiments around the earlier “fine-shape closure” observation, and only one part of that picture survived clearly: a matched push has much less influence on later futures as the system ages, even though siblings do not converge and the fresh confirmation cannot resolve the original tiny shape contrast.
What happened when we repeated it
The earlier effect remains possible, although it is not confirmed.
The first −0.00399 fine-shape result came from one predeclared secondary contrast, while its structural-peak timing arm was selected after the data were visible and only 5 of 78 predeclared contrasts separated from zero. We then made that shape contrast the sole primary in a fresh 12-family experiment, which returned an interval crossing zero.
Frozen follow-ups · prediction-by-predictionThe four rows have different units; they are intentionally not plotted on one shared numeric axis.
frozen The lookalike-count line is a pre-named secondary.The interval runs from −0.0076 to +0.0038, with six families in each direction and no arm contrast separating from zero; the earlier −0.0040 remains within what a 12-family cohort could miss.
Pre-turn pushes move later futures more than post-turn pushes, with interval +0.00185 to +0.00545 and the same direction in 15/16 families; push divergence falls by about 69% with age.
The frozen prediction expected early width to exceed late width, but every family went in the opposite direction as siblings spread farther apart with age.
The matched-present future-distance ratio does not rise cleanly, while a separate pre-named lookalike count collapses from 6,144 to 1,665 with ρ −0.988.
What survives is a cleaner distinction: an individual body can become harder to redirect even while its sibling population occupies a wider range of mature forms.
05 · developmental causal impedance
The same standardized write produces less future change as the body ages.
We applied the same fixed intervention at 19 developmental ages across 64 organisms in 16 groups, producing 7,296 exact futures; although the write continued to touch essentially the same fraction of matter, its downstream effect steadily weakened, and that damping extended across development rather than beginning abruptly at the information turn.
Frozen dose response · entry and recoveryFixed-dose D4 declines from 0.002061 early to 0.000186 late, a ~91% loss. Affected matter fraction remains 0.11940 versus 0.11904.
frozen The approximate dose-match arm is not an exact matched-dose experiment.Frozen age × horizon map · downstream dampingFixed-dose differences remain separated at D120 and D240, while the proposed turn-specific whole-minus-sum gate is flat (p=0.2105).
The measured damping is development-wide, and this experiment does not locate its beginning at the information turn.The late-minus-early difference is −0.001875, with interval −0.002155 to −0.001579 and the same direction in all 16 families.
Realized matter L1 falls from 56.94 to 34.18, but normalizing by the physical write makes D4 fall still further, to factor 0.0799 [0.0661,0.0969].
Only 1,880 of 3,648 selected matches lie within 25% of the target, and the early dose-floor fallback was used in 401/768, so this arm is explicitly approximate.
Restricting the post-hoc comparison to common support leaves D120 and D240 damping at −0.00461 and −0.00889, with the same direction in all 16 families.
06 · the controller tournament
Whole-state feedback reaches the target while it is active, although its unique edge disappears.
We compared whole-state feedback with sham, replay, and the strongest local controller available for each instance; after correcting the comparator exactly as the frozen plan required, whole-state feedback still moved the target, but it did not outperform the best restricted alternative and did not gain a larger advantage with development.
One comparator error, repaired
The earlier joint “pass” has been replaced by the corrected result.
The frozen plan put sham=0 inside the maximum comparator, but the first analysis accidentally left it out; the corrected result, SHA 4b30ab79…, therefore replaces the original result, SHA 25e2802b…, whenever we compare the controllers jointly.
Corrected frozen forest · achievement versus advantageWhole-state feedback actively moves the target, but restricted alternatives are competitive. The joint primary is not met.
corrected sham included in the per-instance comparator.The interval is +3.4167 to +5.0271, with the same direction in 16/16 families, so active target achievement survives the correction.
Against the strongest per-instance sham, replay, or local comparator, the interval is -0.6762 to +1.2916 and crosses zero.
The change in comparative advantage with development has interval -0.5633 to +1.6612, which also crosses zero.
At the frozen held-out endpoint, the interval is -11.2502 to -2.7983 and 12/16 families are negative, so the comparative advantage reverses after release.
Release curve · the comparative edge does not persistOnly +128 is the frozen held-out endpoint. Intermediate ages are post-hoc descriptive. The result concerns whole-policy advantage over comparators, not absolute target control after release.
heldout +128 exact frozen statistic: −6.5831 [−11.2502, −2.7983]Architecture diagnostic · controllers take different routesWhole-state sequences are 188/192 unique. Route nonredundancy is not an information quantity and does not rescue the null advantage primary.
posthoc
The system is genuinely steerable during the active window, yet that does not give the whole-state observer a unique advantage: equally resourced restricted policies remain competitive, and the whole policy’s comparative edge reverses after release.
07 · causal individuality
By q12→24, each source already responds in a recognizable way.
We call the pattern of changes produced by a standardized probe a response fingerprint, or informally a causal address; after removing the linear component of 17 predefined passive summaries, that fingerprint can re-identify its source across development, although each source also has a unique genotype and this experiment cannot yet tell biography from genome.
Frozen passport intervals · retrieval and residual marginThe earliest interval passes with residual margin 0.23063 [0.18599, 0.27062], 17/18 group directions. q48→64 fails only the pooled top-1 gate while its margin remains positive.
frozen onset left-censored; no “birth at q12.”Top-1 retrieval reaches 12/72 against a frozen 99% permutation threshold of 7/72, while the residual margin is +0.23063 [0.18599,0.27062].
Within each source quartet, retrieval reaches 43/72 with margin +0.19440, so the post-hoc signal cannot be explained only by broad group separation.
The post-hoc hidden-composition fingerprint retrieves 33/72 globally and 63/72 within the strict quartet, although specimen and genotype remain confounded.
In the post-hoc horizon slices, t8 and t32 remain below the frozen gate while t128 passes; field response also passes where scalar-only response does not.
Frozen transplant · hidden composition perturbs, but does not transfer a donor passportAligned near-donor does not beat phase-scrambled near-donor at q24 or q48. Generic re-encoding disruption is large; donor-specific transfer is unsupported.
q24 aligned−scrambled −0.0247 [−0.0543,+0.0049]; q48 +0.0231 [−0.0091,+0.0577].07b · looking inside the fingerprint
The recognizable response is field-like, distributed, and slow to read.
These post-hoc panels replay already sealed runs to show where the fingerprint seems to live and which next comparisons should be frozen; they leave the original passport decision unchanged.
We reproduced the stored primary exactly.
max Δ = 0A second source-bound implementation recovered the primary passport and transplant quantities with no numerical drift, which checks the arithmetic without changing their experimental status.
The earliest fingerprint remains recognizable among its nearest neighbors.
0.194When each source is compared only with the other three members of its frozen quartet, the q12→q24 residual margin remains positive; interval [0.143, 0.245], 17/18 groups positive. Within-quartet top-1 is 59.7% against 25% chance.
The recognizable response depends on geometry, not only totals.
0.253 vs 0.038Visible-field features pass the frozen gate, while 384 scalar features alone do not; the scalar margin interval [-0.008, 0.082] crosses zero.
The response becomes clearest after it has time to unfold.
Each bar is the q12→q24 residual same-source margin, and the isolated t8 and t32 slices remain below the frozen gate while t128 passes it.
No single probe direction carries the fingerprint.
Native and orthogonal probes pass when isolated, as do positive and negative signs, and their similar margins point toward a response distributed across directions rather than owned by one privileged probe.
Three of four probe locations remain recognizable on their own.
All four anchors retain positive mean margins, although A03 alone misses its own permutation gate, so the fingerprint is broad without being spatially uniform.
Hidden composition carries a strong fingerprint too.
0.237Across 432 hidden-response features, q12→q24 top-1 is 45.8% and within-quartet top-1 is 87.5%. Because every specimen still has a unique genotype, this comparison cannot tell whether that hidden fingerprint belongs to the life history or the genome.
At the later interval, sources become harder to separate globally but remain distinct nearby.
6.9% pooledPooled visible top-1 falls below its 8.3% null bound, yet the strict within-quartet margin is 0.236, within-quartet top-1 is 56.9%, and hidden top-1 remains 36.1%. The global visible neighborhood has therefore become crowded and reorganized, while local and hidden distinctions remain.
Re-encoding perturbs the host, while donor alignment adds no specific transfer.
−0.025 · +0.023Aligned-near minus phase-scrambled donor-axis projection at q24 and q48. Both intervals cross zero; however, near-donor host-response distance exceeds self re-encode by 40.23 at q24 and 21.64 at q48, which shows a large disruption without a donor-specific fingerprint transfer.
Hidden composition changes later futures, but we have not transferred a portable donor identity: the current design lacks a same-genotype donor control, so it cannot yet separate a specimen’s developmental history from its genome.
08 · what we can see across the experiments
The system becomes an individual by changing what can happen next.
Across forecasting, branching, transplantation, and control, the same picture keeps returning: organization appears first as a changing relation among possible futures, interventions, and remembered history, while visible morphology remains plural and autonomous replication has not yet appeared.
Constraint appears before silhouette.
Before the field has settled into a persistent body, it already supports a structured action-world and a prospective rise in whole-over-parts, so its space of possible continuations tells us something the current image alone does not.
Different freedoms close on different schedules.
Event timing, spatial leverage, and action-context rewrite all harden, while sibling basins widen; development therefore narrows some ways of changing without collapsing the population onto one morphology.
Steering works while the controller remains on.
Feedback moves target scores during the active window, although the corrected comparison gives it no unique whole-state advantage and that comparative edge reverses after release.
The response becomes re-identifiable.
By the earliest interval tested, a distributed response fingerprint predicts its specimen or genotype across time beyond the linear component of 17 predefined passive summaries.
Can organization reproduce itself?
We have developmental bodies and exact intervention assays, but we have not yet seen endogenous replication or followed an address through fission.
Is the fingerprint biography or genome?
Specimen and genotype vary together in the current cohort, while the donor-specific transplant contrast is flat; same-genotype independent lives are the direct way to separate them.
When, exactly, does commitment happen?
Information, morphology, impedance, action grammar, and retrieval change on related but non-identical schedules, which suggests development is assembled from several closures rather than one universal event.
09 · the next large swings
Now we can ask whether the recognizable response is learned, portable, and generative.
The experiments above have separated questions that initially looked like one problem, so the next runs can ask directly whether a response belongs to a genotype or a life history, whether feedback can create a self-maintaining regime, where hidden composition stores its influence, and what survives when a body divides.
10 · evidence and correction ledger
The strange observations only matter if the misses remain visible beside them.
Across 98 experiment folders, 11 predeclared tests passed, 25 remained flat or unresolved, 3 went in the opposite direction, 8 stopped or aborted, and 51 were exploratory or descriptive; one controller comparison also required a material protocol correction, which is carried here with the result it replaced.
Experiment census · updated through the three new swings11 predeclared passes, 25 null/unresolved, 3 wrong-direction, 8 stopped/aborted, 51 exploratory/descriptive.
Each category follows the sealed decision field recorded for that experiment.The runs that checked or redirected us
| Experiment | Outcome | What we learned next |
|---|---|---|
| reservoir-causal-steering-v1 | primary chain not met | Across 1,920 trajectories, neither onset reward nor Φ-specific steering survived, which redirected us from a universal steering signal toward developmental coordinates. |
| geometry-turn / countdown | null as lever / null countdown gain | Geometry tracks progress; it does not universally advance the transition or improve held-out countdown. |
| tangent-induced causal grammar | primary unresolved; secondary wrong way | The first-action memory secondary moved opposite the proposed grammar stabilization direction. |
| developmental causal plasticity window | null | Structural peaks did not generalize into broad fanout windows. |
| fresh organic q40 replication | null | Spearman ρ +0.093, interval −0.178 to +0.352. |
| causal compass peak | null | Primary +0.0023, interval −0.0028 to +0.0073. |
| commitment branching | timing primary null | A predeclared fine-field secondary suggested a small contraction, which gave us the exact contrast for a fresh confirmation. |
| latent / ignition transplant | frozen primaries null | Hidden composition changes future direction, although neither a donor axis nor an older developmental clock transferred in the primary comparisons. |
| fine-shape confirmation | unresolved | The original small secondary remains possible but unconfirmed, while the separate fall in steerability with age survived clearly. |
| basin-width init variation | wrong direction | Siblings widen across age. Rigidity and convergence are different axes. |
| whole-control tournament | corrected joint primary null | Original pass superseded after restoring sham to the frozen comparator; active achievement remains real. |
| causal passport transplant | donor-specific contrast null | The aligned transplant does not beat the phase-scrambled control, so generic disruption cannot be read as a transferred donor identity. |
| five sealed aborts | stopped | goal-state bite calibration; goal-state matched-wound recovery; perturbation-recovery engineering v1/v2; reservoir-cycle emergence census. |
| three mechanical stops | no verdict | goal-state tomography 0/8 valid; preinjury predictor feature unavailable; orthogonal pulse release declaration never bound after qualification abort. |
Sealed evidence IDs and hashes
| Role | Evidence ID | SHA-256 |
|---|---|---|
| sealed synthesis-v6 predecessor | EVD-5964FB3EFF03 | c62d798f12c67f37e6b11c6355e723a287969f668972edd1141acd1325ed16ae |
| sealed synthesis-v6 provenance manifest | EVD-B78EB5545DF6 | 71baf2463c4a9fe0e579a6cbd0b8ec9218919564956360a6875d363b1c1de3e2 |
| sealed synthesis-v6 deterministic generator | EVD-A26B074E4773 | 4a34aefd31be5f9e6bfad6e56128c7c0dffcac6a2d88fb5f54b34999c7ecf5c4 |
| sealed synthesis-v4 predecessor and embedded native montages | EVD-8EAFC43B3C6C | 69107dac3f182d4876e3bafe167f33a711c693c68f6f15e1c9a65fc7873af0fd |
| cold-reader vocabulary and onboarding design reference only | EVD-946A36B49360 | b20cf14e68213fc6a06bb2e7f7c449622604008b7f95042b71bdc91558eaa88b |
| sealed synthesis-v5 predecessor | EVD-DBACB86C6967 | a9539ecc2dfddc963bd9476b126e369ca28f0ed0eaa0cdeaedec6c8c97a360a5 |
| sealed synthesis-v5 provenance manifest | EVD-2E4574021C5C | 60f34545ebae16a529a93c864f7e16f242557e5bc08d8c3c4de7b7e73be1dff5 |
| sealed synthesis-v5 chart and image renderer | EVD-A8FAF3900966 | 419d60eb54b703f5eafbdd8c1d4f5579a5b97a0db9187d458f928a89a4e19407 |
| shared Specter paper-sheet style | EVD-F855C44BEF6F | a28376706e9e68b08ed3d8e07cbe97c7b63be4817de94e0bf55c67a1184c09ce |
| measured result | EVD-576E1802AD46 | c6e3c6634d04de86ee89f5d11dec423e936befe81e022240a82dbdbc85daf963 |
| measured result | EVD-23EE3D7349AB | bf1e0f3a082f256747f2d80f054a9d590f34ae9db28a83a6f6b9aa81d2fd2b1a |
| measured result | EVD-FFDF7A14B6A5 | 269d280de5e93b8b93882ff900c41fb1f2750a256dfb145e284cbeca2cf4d742 |
| measured result | EVD-12A05DC9B836 | 98a5aa04dba2c35aacd0035fbbb0747c8d792cffc276e7ff480d3f80172a693e |
| post-hoc geometry-turn discovery map | EVD-EAB5DB60CE60 | 2074c1bd5abcfef399d5070f1d0b2f1c551ab8ec138d6d36e69bd58272a29753 |
| measured result | EVD-A733E4C90632 | 9fe83df68e0e2cef8ba487673e4bf1005cacc5bb1dbbf84c963b90d8d2602fd4 |
| measured result | EVD-F3EFE143E0FA | 2ccd2af0ed14f2f329ca31fc982f0e1e0d314681db43ba9fd2994c2e586dcf64 |
| measured result | EVD-DC93FDABCDB9 | 99727f878bab51518dddfb618cec0cd98c15bb6fe8b3667f515adb6d933e4817 |
| measured result | EVD-1814FF2CDD39 | 6b3a76b4eb347010d9cb14a9bf57d1c70c69f4612a1bf7fee1b41fb57537f186 |
| measured result | EVD-332371E62656 | 7969f195c566d69717b1430095266bab6132472e42d380015e273a46e5b71fc6 |
| measured result | EVD-F74E43048478 | b7fc337afa1f605e7de16a59c9e9797804b5039b29fa45f600529dd930d6aac3 |
| measured result | EVD-E1D10103BD5B | 785e801c2f7c8ad7feba79c25463f195efe55467677f8f04eb78bd28a1b68888 |
| measured result | EVD-4C72AE9BBF91 | f6d6078b264fb0285a1dd8982fe9bd3a749f01a0ace89f766a8735297f822e40 |
| post-hoc hidden-composition counterweight | EVD-9287D545E9DF | 086729c395b6d6c06b79969a0eacb7fb615f8ec0a3ac7a333efb28bcbbfc2f33 |
| measured result | EVD-3B048683D3C2 | ef00428ea459e805f786f32fc7f399528c3cb589f1991ed6f39b0a9f20d37a00 |
| measured result | EVD-EDDE5B0C6E5F | 200e1c14daef2d965fff12ccb167ca70b7ecaad410393ab2a7d445401d920e17 |
| post-hoc tangent aperture exploration | EVD-318BC93528A0 | aa28dfa388708b7679acce9b7845f48922d9f1886e2bc2a733bef9198d943b23 |
| measured result | EVD-691097832F30 | abd5bbe063064cc4b1d1c55d331a51b4970d764412ab776bcd79010c236c948d |
| source-bound morphology timing exploration | EVD-0C5B8BA61150 | e31b5f34e1dfc8f5573c8433c0ff6d05777f7fc52fe116a71cbbc140f47fec21 |
| measured result | EVD-2B2521383E28 | 5318aa930cd789d446372828dd0fc1bcf55edbeafc7b07d7868feb76d5bc77d4 |
| measured result | EVD-24EB731B0375 | 7f88560f446752adb31483f8f9e5f851a67069e97050d40393ab26784f98f949 |
| measured result | EVD-C08F9A273C3F | f71fd77f180cd081ea9011970ac2e109ec7b25179b5b7982f467a8f40deed91e |
| measured result | EVD-2260AEF15784 | 6cb3e4a06fa6244bc2347d11543d0a54484105edb7fbd346c0e9202380bf68f1 |
| measured result | EVD-F81B7CEC2D5F | eab15f3c894edf4c8865f8ebc22f7ee84a9052b630d1376c593ae29967ca1815 |
| measured result | EVD-734A7CE620CD | 3ff7652b91f2670201364275e46dc11bb806c0316f574cff79847f889971436e |
| measured result | EVD-7699DC8F290E | 18eed6194ce1125f77e12ca0966b3104b8388d89b09fdce13678d5faf43d3ac6 |
| measured result | EVD-8B48D5938B65 | a321b7922195f0a8cf3198d6961f2159ed4c6065b8cef69a3b9e616d21f7bc2e |
| measured result | EVD-13EAFA6D6309 | 779277c93261976e9d95eacb2812cbc4f69e03005e9af3063d7329f4a30fb8f3 |
| frozen impedance result | EVD-5F9E6026041B | c1ed7f40cfe27c71101bdded5786905e718ba2b12bb48aa6ced7a5b824377b81 |
| post-hoc source-bound impedance exploration | EVD-99EEA474EB4C | c33c34b4e60a742ca3f0b390aacc48c0216a67bf460a47e2c7d654d671375ca7 |
| frozen impedance protocol material | EVD-7839E361BDCC | 15ddf2289ad599582e3bae62314a55c8f696670364b351069e501e215af6ee98 |
| impedance freeze receipt | EVD-ABFC639C6C64 | 750a3ebb726e2515ee32ce46914b7b2dcfc6a2fd3e34c3780daecc38b1bf9f3b |
| protocol-conformant corrected tournament result | EVD-FC49651F5B57 | 4b30ab79f8df950d34d506b9727760681bd74d4380a1adefed8fe0ac8605eeeb |
| superseded original tournament result; non-authoritative joint decision | EVD-B2F305BD7E11 | 25e2802b7a73e4117466b5226e6e52aa3def11140fff866f2ac6fe8bb6a5e9fb |
| source-bound controller sequence material; post-hoc architecture diagnostic | EVD-6A7491D1554F | 2487686622838460878ab9ec43654f88913932103a2071e8bfe834b8f3881b58 |
| frozen tournament protocol material | EVD-12FD2ADCAFD4 | a8919863c8bddf7c02c8d9309b9164068b77643f419b1cc678940d8f1e25bb23 |
| frozen causal-passport result | EVD-77B196F47EE2 | 1d9ff7e65115ea4ac80a0e2e4d1171625b556e1497401eb067ddea3e8d1e17c3 |
| post-hoc source-bound passport exploration and exact replay | EVD-AC2C1013A74A | 30936fc81d2527c7458de1f0095f2fd828badfe820389369fe7ac8f421c1eb88 |
| frozen causal-passport protocol material | EVD-950E3EFD068E | 9c4e4face3df57b152d10fc764ca4cf27675d317cf35b622138ba57ea44c8a1e |
| causal-passport freeze receipt | EVD-4D2C644A1CA2 | b055e6a19eb38e551f05db07bbdb8c8b36614d9468f7c59a4b2f8c7b73488b42 |
Native and derived image IDs
| Role | Image ID | SHA-256 |
|---|---|---|
| byte-extracted native prospective developmental trajectory montage | IMG-E48588A70799 | 3e5670c3ad3ab7d2beab36cdb529eb2d66f42816cfbc9ccbbd80027dbe2d1d4c |
| byte-extracted native feedback release comparison montage | IMG-60248AA37251 | a6e9572da0d7d71a4104284ea0f06da81f34d9af0ccdff358ec5154e6a5263bb |
| native developmental frame at age 60 | IMG-8F6E061ACF62 | 7a1c39cb454d6c022c706d87d417d0a4b14fb1fa6c647a55a254382854847a9d |
| native developmental frame at age 180 | IMG-658DE7C18F61 | c56cf492b396830a881833a8c82d6869a4e8cce48863cb460602a3e7e412e7db |
| native developmental frame at age 380 | IMG-6C6474CD6BC7 | fa119a60abc8e3ff224d7172761f9c66c0a091d59383afd0d6df210798025972 |
| native developmental frame at age 580 | IMG-2F3E5D20889A | 7a1093501672d8b50fb34435cbb7344c2ae31c4f96d8d18e8026f6aaee955d1f |
| native developmental frame at age 780 | IMG-9DD02C18B9F9 | ed28a6850c663844e4d72cf08b6e5f96c964313235346f3cbe3711cb34005338 |
| native tournament exemplar Active · whole | IMG-EED133DF57E9 | cc724f622f78c40a9171eebb5d2194199c80f428b12da113519f6290e38f1af4 |
| native tournament exemplar Active · best local | IMG-B25F71C929CC | aad362c0e100004e3bf2c8436bb2b6bcce756a9788b98c7e1c44158a29693ec6 |
| native tournament exemplar Active · replay | IMG-F9467E8B4EC5 | 1c7d63537fa9cbc3aaeda55947d50db175b104245783f084a69c1a8b8088ed35 |
| native tournament exemplar Active · sham | IMG-03080F67906E | 3947254526a4326db4efbd8d150a7fa884cf2a81cc9a0c392795551ef06255e5 |
| native tournament exemplar +128 · whole | IMG-FFD558546277 | 959d277763b6c7ebcdfc2be0f3b1ee34c4aa9b575dd1bdc89ecfecb68bd32e0b |
| native tournament exemplar +128 · best local | IMG-327BF2B7A473 | d6cd010127373694c8892494c1e323bf7348dcde5a80d6779f3762f3ae182f11 |
| native tournament exemplar +128 · replay | IMG-507632025964 | ba06a3425f6cf4edca537ff2a3613a59ce2d82b048daba4ff702c69d2cdb2be8 |
| native tournament exemplar +128 · sham | IMG-3A6CA461F019 | c2686e7804629f4779dbe1ec9cf84111ea5e832b04d14ffbf26f68ed6a3cfea2 |
| derived visible/hidden q48 render for self_reencode | IMG-4AE217F20782 | aad030fc4e254401c3e2e3bc353ad84b8d1a4c1e4b3536460e12662fceff9813 |
| derived visible/hidden q48 render for near_donor | IMG-6C8A33A1DB3B | 9c0d888446c9aba66f232d2c4d0fa3eca8a1c69bbc55ee93851fa71e7875aa8a |
| derived visible/hidden q48 render for far_donor | IMG-3EF9A2CF50AE | 59c66e2a14dcf96cc417f8a6ebfb8a354aa5b019fec6267b16dfa642b9a982ad |
| derived visible/hidden q48 render for near_scrambled | IMG-75875DC8239D | 40b1248b51715f4147a9194c54d266edbfeb5067aec0fd8587f51e5f0f9ea686 |
Correction and predecessor seals
| Sealed synthesis-v6 | c62d798f12c67f37e6b11c6355e723a287969f668972edd1141acd1325ed16ae |
|---|---|
| v6 provenance manifest | 71baf2463c4a9fe0e579a6cbd0b8ec9218919564956360a6875d363b1c1de3e2 |
| v6 generator | 4a34aefd31be5f9e6bfad6e56128c7c0dffcac6a2d88fb5f54b34999c7ecf5c4 |
| Canonical synthesis-v4 | 69107dac3f182d4876e3bafe167f33a711c693c68f6f15e1c9a65fc7873af0fd |
| Final audited synthesis-v5 | a9539ecc2dfddc963bd9476b126e369ca28f0ed0eaa0cdeaedec6c8c97a360a5 |
| v5 manifest | 60f34545ebae16a529a93c864f7e16f242557e5bc08d8c3c4de7b7e73be1dff5 |
| v5 generator | 419d60eb54b703f5eafbdd8c1d4f5579a5b97a0db9187d458f928a89a4e19407 |
| Corrected tournament result | 4b30ab79f8df950d34d506b9727760681bd74d4380a1adefed8fe0ac8605eeeb |
| Superseded tournament result | 25e2802b7a73e4117466b5226e6e52aa3def11140fff866f2ac6fe8bb6a5e9fb |
| Passport frozen result | 1d9ff7e65115ea4ac80a0e2e4d1171625b556e1497401eb067ddea3e8d1e17c3 |
| Passport audit replay | maximum absolute difference 0; exploration SHA 30936fc81d2527c7458de1f0095f2fd828badfe820389369fe7ac8f421c1eb88 |