We were asking
Can one hidden field contain distinct instructions whose meanings depend on different spatial scales?
Coarse, phase-aligned organization carried expansion, while compactification survived fine-scale isolation and much stronger phase destruction, so the two directions were encoded with different spatial syntax.
Can one hidden field contain distinct instructions whose meanings depend on different spatial scales?
Yes; expansion required broad relational phase, whereas compactification retained a usable fine-scale component and responded differently to orientation.
Do unrelated organisms share any part of this syntax, or does each body supply its own private decoder?