We were asking
Do different organisms interpret the same hidden phase fields with a shared developmental vocabulary?
Rankings across twelve phase fields were essentially uncorrelated between unrelated families, although one field repeatedly biased development toward expansion and away from compactification.
Do different organisms interpret the same hidden phase fields with a shared developmental vocabulary?
Most of the vocabulary was private to the body, with one candidate shared axis embedded inside otherwise individualized response rankings.
Does that candidate field retain its sign and orientation when transformed or moved into families outside the original language class?