We were asking
Does an early difference in causal openness remain an abstract score, or does it become part of the later body?
Open and closed branches stayed visibly different throughout the held-out future, becoming broader, less rectangular, and more topologically active in different ways; however, the action pair chosen to maximize the early split no longer beat its within-organism control at step 256.
Does an early difference in causal openness remain an abstract score, or does it become part of the later body?
The gate-conditioned branches remained far apart through step 256, but the selected action target's extra advantage disappeared; this is durable branch memory, not demonstrated long-horizon target control.
Can a gate state help steer a fresh organism toward a mature morphology that was named before the future was opened?