We were asking
Can feedback hold a developing system in a state where more causal histories remain distinguishable, rather than merely disturbing it repeatedly?
A controller that tested five pulse sizes at each passage usually chose one strong early intervention and then restraint, and the resulting difference between alternative causal histories persisted for eight passages after control ended.
Can feedback hold a developing system in a state where more causal histories remain distinguishable, rather than merely disturbing it repeatedly?
Early state-aware control kept the causal gate open, while blindly applying the full pulse at every passage drove the comparison in the other direction.
Does the open state give the same later actions more genuinely different futures, and what bodies do those futures eventually produce?